GlobalAutoTV
Click to watch Daniel P. Malone -
Click to watch Daniel P. Malone -
asia resources


Need an office in Asia? Office suites, meeting rooms, virtual offices, network access



free downloads
ASIA: "Manufacturing in India: Opportunities, Challenges and Myths" report

ASIA: "Manufacturing in India: Opportunities, Challenges and Myths" report. 47-page report by KPMG International.

proceed to download
eJournals




back to index backASIAtalk March,  2006


Why the Next Decade Will Be Neither Chinese Nor Indian

China and India are poised to be the next economic powerhouses of the world. However, according to Prabhu Guptara, Japan’s preeminence in robotic technology may require us to reconsider their economic potential. In this two-part series, he makes an argument for Japan, while also illuminating his concerns for a future with highly sophisticated robots.

It is now fashionable to talk of the 21st century as if it will be the "Asian Century" — with China being touted as the coming power, economically and militarily.

Given that I am Indian, it will hardly be a surprise to find that I am not among the fans of this theory regarding the future.

But you may be surprised to find me only a little more sanguine about India — and putting my money instead on Japan.

Robots to the rescue

My choice may be particularly surprising, given that Japan's economy has been dragging for the last 25 or more years, in spite of everything that the Japanese government has tried.

So why am I now putting my money on Japan? Sadly, it is not because I believe that Japan is on the verge of rejecting the cultural limitations imposed by its past.

Rather, it is because of robots! My view of Japan's place in the world through the next couple of decades started changing in mid-summer 2005, when I was one of the over 22 million people who visited the World Expo in Aichi.

Huge advances

My main interest in going to the Expo was to catch up with what Japan had been doing in robotics, as Japan leads the world in this field. I have been following developments in robotics for some time.

The developments that I saw were both exciting — and frightening. Robots could be seen:

• playing music in an opera, specially written for them by a French composer

• multiplying manifold the physical strength of an old, sick or weak person
• cleaning surfaces (including vertical windows in high-rise buildings)

• playing baseball (pitching as well as batting)

• performing or assisting surgery (including brain surgery)

• acting as guards (they had 360 degree vision, were able to spot a human even on the other side of a (thin) wall and ascertain whether that person was authorized to be there. If not, and if the person came to a door or window, the robots were able to fire 20 paint balls a minute at the intruder. They could also check for fires — and so on).

Robotic diversity

In addition, there were therapeutic robots, child robots (able to talk and play with children and even give them educational quizzes), dog robots, snake robots, amphibious robots, self-reshaping robots, bomb-disposal robots.

Some could communicate with each other, others could tell you I am hungry” when they start running out of electricity and then take themselves off for recharging. There were robots designed for reception work in offices and hotels (already able to speak four languages — very good voice recognition, although a bit slow).

On two legs

Other robots had legs” so that they can walk along or go up stairs. They could also transfer their own weight to wheels in order to speed along a paved surface.

Despite the fact that their tolerance of road irregularities is presently only ten centimeters, that they are only able to go up or down inclines of 10% at present and that their maximum speed is currently only six kilometers per hour, there is no reason why these limitations couldn’t be overcome in the future.

There were robots that could take you around obstacles (living and non-living) to a predetermined destination without needing to be driven.”

Creative wiring

There was even an artist” robot that created caricatures of the people in front of it, using crayons on huge rice crackers (you could take home the caricature of yourself, but the queue was too long, so I did not bother to have mine done).

There was also a "dance" robot, but, as far as I could discern, the poor male (human) dancer was actually pushing and shoving the "female dance robot" around — the robot was not dancing by itself. OK, so these were all prototypes and there remain many glitches to be sorted out.

Working out the glitches

The "active life" of these prototypes seemed to me rather short (an enormous number of them were out of commission, being repaired, so that I could not see them in action).

Presumably, I would have been even more impressed if they were also working. But what will happen when these glitches have been sorted out and such robots can be mass-manufactured?

The Japanese are fully committed to making that possible in the next seven to ten years. And even the existing prototypes are already remarkably cheap.

Solution for a graying society

The whole theme at the Expo was to soothe and reassure the primarily Japanese public that these robots were intended to assist particularly an ageing society in Japan.

The accompanying propaganda was in full swing, using music, multimedia and interpersonal interaction with the scientists and technologists involved in developing robots.

But if the main problem is ageing, it is much easier — and would contribute to sorting out other world problems — if an appropriate number of poor unemployed young people from around the world were to be imported into Japan and taught the Japanese language and culture.

After all, one can begin to cope with the spoken language in about two months, although the written language is an entirely different matter — and the culture is even more difficult. But presumably robots will not be able to cope with nuances of culture in the foreseeable future either.

After the revolution

In any case, the Expo did not address this question: If we have robots that can do all these things, what jobs” will be left for humans to do?

As far as I can make out, only creative jobs (such as art, music, literature and cuisine), scientific jobs (such as discovering new knowledge and systematizing it — including, for example, history), and technological jobs (such as conceiving, designing, prototyping, manufacturing and maintaining robots).

Not a small number of jobs, of course, but nowhere near the 500 million or so "jobs" that exist today.

Fuzzy logic

And even these creative, scientific and technological jobs will be left for humans to do only as long as quantum computers with fuzzy logic won’t start being produced.

I am told on good authority that such computers are about ten years away — but even if they are 20 years away, that is not a particularly long time.

Elimination of the middle class

All products and technologies have historically gravitated towards the mass or middle-class market. Technology has slowly been eroding the size of the middle class in most developed societies, displacing the middle either into the richer or the poorer classes.

However, the impact of robotics on this middle level will be to more or less completely eliminate the middle class from the world economy.

The result will be a world divided even more firmly into the rich and the poor, with a mass of disaffected, but relatively educated people in the middle. In time, robots will move both up and down the value chain to displace even more people.

In any case, the jobs that would be left to do in a robot-driven world are not jobs that the mass of human beings can do.

Moreover, if we could do them, the oversupply of humans for each position would be so great as to make it nearly impossible for people to support themselves at the wage level.

If the mass of people turned, instead, to producing products and services which are not going to be produced by the sorts of robots that the Japanese are preparing to launch, then the over-production of such non-robotic goods and services would be so huge as to render the resulting products” (under the current economic system) monetarily nearly worthless.

The above feature represents the personal views of Professor Prabhu Guptara, and was contributed in an entirely personal capacity.

Source: The Globalist - GAI


previous page

go top



search our site


Loading

ASIAtalk

Other articles from the same issue (March,  2006).

Automotive and Components Market in Asia report
play read on

India's Hottest Jobs
play read on

India becomes an international player
play read on

Japanese Parts Makers’ Group To Teach Indonesian Suppliers Art of Die-Making
play read on

Why the Next Decade Will Be Neither Chinese Nor Indian
play read on

The rise of China and its implications for the division of labor in Asia
play read on

China Facing Serious Job Shortage
play read on

Shanghai Property Market Overview
play read on

Navigating the Visa Process in Asia-Pacific—A Guide for India, Japan, and the People’s Republic of China
play read on

Country Profile: South Korea
play read on

Outsourcing Frontier: Yanks Need Apply
play read on

Global Insight Raises China Growth Forecasts
play read on

The Siren Song of Technonationalism
play read on

Our Take: Analyzing Aberdeen’s Take on Middle Market Sourcing
play read on


Our Free eJournals
GlobalAutoExperts

To visit GlobalAutoExperts Directory, click here.


©2008 GlobalAutoIndustry.com | HCI Group, Ltd.
101 West Big Beaver Road, Suite 1400 | Troy, MI 48084 USA
USA Tel: +1.248.687.1060 | USA Fax: +1.248.927.0347
Fax UK: +44.(0)845.127.4765 | Fax Europe: +31.20.524.1659 | Fax Asia: +852.3015.8120